Re: Summary of implicit DEPENDS problem

[Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>]

> I don't like "implicit" as that means "not stated", and these are
> manifest in pkgsrc sources, just not in the original package.  So this
> sort of feels like "recursive" except that it isn't recursive, or at
> least I hope not.  I would therefore suggest CHAIN_DEPENDS or
> NESTED_DEPENDS.
I'm not a native speaker, but "indirect" would seem most natural to mee.