Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-pkg%mumble.net@localhost> writes: > (The details of the significance of the plugins to Inkscape determines > whether this should be a graphics/inkscape-base vs meta-pkgs/inkscape > pair or a graphics/inkscape vs graphics/inkscape-plugins pair.) Agreed, and not just significance but what is normal in other packaging systems. My default position before understanding is that that the bare name should correspond to what upstream and the rest of the world see as normal, and my view is that it is odd to avoid numpy on any machine used for desktop use*, so most everyone else will include it. Actual facts welcome of course. * After all, on such a machine you need to build rust, newer gcc and cmake in almost all cases. gcc for fortran just isn't that big any more :-(
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature