Re: Asterisk package naming

[D'Arcy Cain <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On 2018-08-03 09:06 AM, Edgar Fuß wrote:
>> My point is that asterisk stands alone in our package system this way,
>> Every other package with multiple versions either has a meta version,
>> has the version in PKGNAME or has no package with the un-versioned name.
> ?
> 
> mail/dovecot (1.2), mail/dovecot2
> print/cup15, print/cups (2.x)
> net/freeradius (1.x), net/freeradius2

I stand corrected.  I am surprised that I didn't trip over dovecot since
I do install that.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy%NetBSD.org@localhost>
http://www.NetBSD.org/ IM:darcy%Vex.Net@localhost