tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?

To: tech-pkg <tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 12:53:25 +0200

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:11:14AM -0500, Jason Bacon wrote:
> Thanks.  I'll propose a patch to NCBI to make their configure script a
> little smarter.  Their code already supports statvfs(), but it tries to use
> statfs() on NetBSD simply because it's present in libc.

Just make it prefer statvfs. There is no reason to ever use statfs if
statvfs is supported.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
  - From: Jason Bacon

References:
- Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
  - From: Jason Bacon
- Re: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
  - From: Jason Bacon

Prev by Date: Re: Packaging krita, QT5/KDE problem
Next by Date: pkgsrc-wip: "../mk/libusb.mk" disappeared?
Previous by Thread: Re: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
Next by Thread: Re: Is statfs() still supposed to be in libc?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index