Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost> writes: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:20:55AM +0900, SODA Noriyuki wrote: >> He is saying: >> I think the best thing is to remove the 4th clause. >> It seesm the reason why the 4th clause was added was >> because the advertising clause was very common at that age. >> I'll make contact with IIJ, and ask them to release a >> license-modified version at github or somewhere. >> >> So, stay tuned. > > Perhaps in the meantime I could commit the package with unspecifed > licence? There's no need to do that. It's perfectly ok to add a license with a -license suffix and point to it; no approvals or permission is needed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature