Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language

To: David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
From: Benny Siegert <bsiegert%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 17:51:51 +0200

On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 03:17:23 +0000
David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:

> I have no idea to what extent upstream is or isn't interested in
> contributed backends for e.g. sparc or mips.

There is a clear policy for adding more architectures, see https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/PortingPolicy. Note that upstream also supports arm64, ppc64, ppc64le, mips64 and mips64le. But none of these are supported on NetBSD, IIRC.

-- 
Benny Siegert <bsiegert%gmail.com@localhost>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
  - From: Martin Husemann

References:
- Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
  - From: Roland Illig
- Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
  - From: David Holland
- Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
  - From: William 'Cryo' Coldwell
- Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
  - From: David Holland

Prev by Date: Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
Next by Date: Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
Previous by Thread: Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
Next by Thread: Re: Rewriting pkglint in a portable language
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index