[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: 2013Q3 freeze pre-announcement
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:27:18 +0200
From: Pierre Pronchery <khorben%defora.org@localhost>
When signing with "gpg", it requires an implementation (probably
security/gnupg) to be installed and available. This may be problematic
for bulk builds, because this binary would then need to be bootstrapped
first in some way - without signing its package obviously.
Why would security/gnupg be a problem for bulk builds any more than
pkgtools/pbulk, net/rsync, &c.?
Main Index |
Thread Index |