[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Why adding unconditional dependency on tradcpp? (Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/tightvnc)
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:46:21 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:17:58AM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:56:10 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger
>On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:32:53PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
>>On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 21:15:36 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger
>>>Always use tradcpp. Fix prototypes. Bump revision.
>>You are doing such changes (Always use tradcpp) for not a little packages,
>>whereas I have ever no problem before.
>>Then, why not do it as conditionally (for broken situation for you)?
>I strongly prefer to get consistent behavior. Given that this is imake
>we are talking about, any improvement on that front is worth the minimal
"we"? you and who?
I cannot find `imake' in x11/libX11, x11/libXext, x11/libXt,....?
devel/imake. Note that I already killed using native imake for exactly
the same reason.
And you must maintain tradcpp by yourself, because upstream developers
will not take care of missing features for a such local tool.
I dislike the situation, future update of packages may be blocked by it,
waiting for your fix (the worst case, broken silently).
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |