[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Why adding unconditional dependency on tradcpp? (Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/net/tightvnc)
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:56:10 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:32:53PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 21:15:36 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger
>Always use tradcpp. Fix prototypes. Bump revision.
You are doing such changes (Always use tradcpp) for not a little packages,
whereas I have ever no problem before.
Then, why not do it as conditionally (for broken situation for you)?
I strongly prefer to get consistent behavior. Given that this is imake
we are talking about, any improvement on that front is worth the minimal
"we"? you and who?
I cannot find `imake' in x11/libX11, x11/libXext, x11/libXt,....?
For consistent behavior, you can kill platform native X, libraries, tools,
compiler... support and force to use them from pkgsrc and you can create
your perfect world.
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |