tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: update to devel/lettuce
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 08:46:29PM -0400, rodent%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 04:37:51PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:30:23PM -0400, matthew sporleder wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:04 PM, <rodent%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> > > > Attached is an update for devel/lettuce. This package probably would be
> > > > better
> > > > renamed as py-lettuce, agreed?
> > >
> > >
> > > Personally I don't think programs which happen to be written in a
> > > programming language should get the lang- prefix unless they are a
> > > library.
> >
> > The question is whether it makes sense to have e.g. a Python 2.6 and
> > Python 2.7 version as binary package.
>
> Hmm, it doesn't build with python33 due to what seems to be an incompatibility
> with distutils. Commit as is without renaming the package and set it with
> PYTHON_VERSIONS_ACCEPTED = 27 26 until we work out how we're handling
> distutils and setuptools for different python versions (what we have now isn't
> optimal)?
Please just drop the PYTHON_3X_ACCEPTED...
Joerg
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index