Alistair Crooks <agc%pkgsrc.org@localhost> writes: > Let's take the hit up-front and do the split. We can keep BUILD_DEPENDS > until it's done, and add HOST_DEPENDS and LINK_DEPENDS (with better > names, obviously), with BUILD_DEPENDS being the aggregation of > both. I don't think we should talk about the aggregation of TOOL_DEPENDS and TARGET_BUILD_DEPENDS (my preferred name, with BUILD_DEPENDS getting added to both and generating a warning as a transition scheme); I don't understand what the union means, other than one needs distfiles. Any given package could be in one or the other or both, for independent reasons.
Description: PGP signature