I am looking for the LICENSE= of ham/trustedQSL (in wip now). Two comments: It would be fair to ask upstream to clean up their licensing, if they can, so that they are clearly using a typical approved license. In general, we consider the license to have the author as a free variable. So if the diff is only in years and the author, it is the same *license*, issued by a different *author*, even if there is a textual diff. I read the (wdiff -3). It's close in some ways, but it really isn't the same. So I'd say that pcc-license probably is a free license (plus it's odd to ahve it repeated). And trustedqsl-license is probably free, but hasn't been approved. It seems like 3-clause BSD that has been rewritten.n If the ARRL really does hold copyright, or there are few authors, this should be easy for them to fix. I'll write to them.
Description: PGP signature