tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: broken packages for 2012Q3

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:12:04PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Yes, they should. The goal is to produce *working* binary packages.

Despite PKG_DEVELOPER bloking the build, xentools41 is working fine.
The library with the problem is not used.

> The overhead of PKG_DEVELOPER is quite low, so please don't spread any
> FUD.

The build box is severely I/O bound. PKG_DEVELOPER does some checks that
requires lots of IO on large packages. Even on my desktop with a reasonable
disk I can feel it.

Manuel Bouyer <>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index