[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: LFS vs procfs on SunOS
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 08:36:01AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> I don't see any reason to cater to this stupidity.
That is, patching programs to use open64() and the rest of that
nonsense is a nonstarter, hacking programs to compile with small off_t
and fail randomly on large files is a bad idea. That leaves patching
programs to avoid the procfs headers, which is probably not going to
be very possible/effective, or ignoring the problem.
I guess another option is to teach gcc fixincludes to patch up Sun's
mess, but that's not likely to be fun.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |