Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/audio/tunapie

[Hans Rosenfeld <rosenfeld%grumpf.hope-2000.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:27:13PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:29:18PM +0100, Hans Rosenfeld wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:16:15PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:12:12AM +0100, Hans Rosenfeld wrote:
> > > > Besides, why is it a good idea to use REPLACE_BASH etc. but not to do 
> > > > the
> > > > same with REPLACE_SH?
> > > 
> > > REPLACE_BASH is the exception, not the rule. It doesn't make sense to
> > > change every single package that installs shell scripts as they can be
> > > detected reliably and automated. If it is a real problem that has to be
> > > solved everywhere, it should be solved in the infrastructure and not
> > > make everything slightly more complicated.
> > 
> > So you suggest adding a check in the infrastructure that finds shell
> > scripts, and replaces the interpreter automatically if needed?
> > 
> > There already is something like that in place that checks for
> > non-existant interpreters, and I have a patch that extends this to check
> > for /bin/sh on Solaris. I could probably extend it further to
> > automatically replace it with TOOLS_PATH.sh or something like that.
> > 
> > Would that be better?
> 
> You could just set REPLACE_SH= * */* */*/* on Solaris by default.

Hm, really? Wouldn't that cause quite some overhead?


Hans


-- 
%SYSTEM-F-ANARCHISM, The operating system has been overthrown