Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/pkgtools/pkg_install/files/lib

[Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>]

Hi,

From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>, Date: Sat, 26 Nov 
2011 21:19:10 +0100

> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 08:11:21PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 08:46:08PM +0100, Alistair Crooks wrote:
>>  > > Modified Files:
>>  > >         pkgsrc/pkgtools/pkg_install/files/lib: license.c
>>  > > 
>>  > > Log Message:
>>  > > Add gnu-agpl-v3 to the default list.
>>  > 
>>  > I think we should probably talk about this one...
>> 
>> yeah, I don't think that one should be turned on by default.
> 
> But, but, it's from the FSF. It must be protecting your freedom! It
> can't be a bad idea, can it be?
> 
> Jesting aside, I agree.

Thanks for comments, all.
I want to move this thread from pkgsrc-changes@ to tech-pkg@.
# Is there better place?

Why gnu-agpl-v3 is not acceptable for pkgsrc?

As far as I know, opensource.org and Debian project accept
gnu-agpl-v3 license.
See 
http://opensource.org/licenses/AGPL-3.0
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495721 .

--
Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB  FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3