[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: RFC: distbb for cross-compiling packages
> I have not fully absorbed your message, but my quick reaction is that
> support for cross-compiling should be independent of bulk/distribution
> tools. But maybe I'm missing something. Are you saying basic cross
> support is present,
Yes, it is present in a very limited form (an explicit separation
between build-host and target-host build-time dependencies is needed!)
and it is independent from bulk build tools like distbb. See
doc/HOWTO-crosscompile-xorg. You can manually build packages one by one
using cross-tools adapting the build-host environment individually for
every package. What I did with distbb is that I tried to automate this
process and make it smooth.
Potential application for cross bulk builds this -- binary packages for
> and you are enhancing distbb to make it easier to
> use in a distributed environment?
distbb was a distributed tool by design from the very beginning. I run
my regular Linux bulk builds on almost 20 virtual machines in a
network. distbb is also fault-tolerant, that is it continues to work
even if some slave hosts become unavailable. See distbb README and
parallel/paexec for details. paexec(1) is an independent tool and is a
foundation for distbb.
Best regards, Aleksey Cheusov.
Main Index |
Thread Index |