Re: syspkgs and kernel

["Aaron J. Grier" <agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost>]

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 05:01:38PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:47:44 +0900, Aaron J. Grier 
> <agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost> 
> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:12:31PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> >>This may be interesting as our pkg_* tools do not (AFAIK) support
> >>installing two versions of the same package.
> >
> >$ pkg_info -e pkg_install
> >pkg_install-20050530
> >pkg_install-20051107
> >pkg_install-20051122
> >pkg_install-20080422
> >pkg_install-20090724
> >
> >someone remind me again what the proper procedure is for updating
> >pkg_install...
> 
> On the other hand, how did you updated pkg_install?
> 
> No extra operation should not be required now,
> both from source ( make update) and binary (pkg_add -u).

orthanc$ pkg_info -e pkg_install
pkg_install-20050530
pkg_install-20051107
pkg_install-20051122
pkg_install-20080422
pkg_install-20090724
$ sudo pkg_add -u pkg_install-20091009.tgz
pkg_add: Unrecognised PLIST command `@mtree +MTREE_DIRS'
[ multiple lines of this.  I assume 20090724 doesn't understand MTREE_DIRS
  installation completes, MESSAGE is displayed ]
$ pkg_info -e pkg_install
pkg_install-20050530
pkg_install-20051107
pkg_install-20051122
pkg_install-20080422
pkg_install-20091009

looks like it replaced 20090724 at least.

how shall I clean this up?

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | 
agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost