[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkgsrc RC scripts
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 06:26:13PM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:48:11PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I am consider to make the RC script support in pkgsrc a bit more
> > out of the box with the following changes:
> > (1) Install pkgsrc RC scripts by default into /etc/rc.pkg.d, not
> > /etc/rc.d and adjust the default value for rc_directories accordingly.
> > This keeps the logical separation between base and pkgsrc RC scripts
> > and still allows /usr (or /usr/pkg) to be on a separate filesystem.
> I don't like that - this messes up installing on shared /usr/pkg
It isn't any worse than the current status.
Maybe i missed some arguments, but
What's the advantage of having the rc.d scripts of pkgsrc packages
inside the root filesystem
(either in /etc/rc.d or /etc/rc.pkg.d or ...) but not /usr/pkg (or
- o.k., rcorder only needs to run once, e.g. we do not have to weave in
the rc scripts
of pkgsrc packages at some stage of the boot process.
But on the other hand, the rc.d scripts from pkgsrc packages generally
from /usr/pkg (or $PREFIX, you know ...) so these scripts need some
/usr/pkg (...) to be mounted when they're to be started (of course there
that want to do something early in the boot process without the
requirement for /usr/pkg
to be mounted already).
But then it would still be early enough to know the rc scripts at the
point in time when
/usr/pkg is mounted. So a script, specifying at which point in time a
should be mounted should be enough. This would then be responsible to
mix in the
rc scripts from that package tree.
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4482 (20091005) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
Main Index |
Thread Index |