[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: What kind of BSD license is meant?
> I'm currently updating devel/p5-DATA-UUID
> (http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-UUID/) and there is as LICENSE simply
> named 'BSD' with the following text:
> > This distribution contains code derived from the sample UUID implementation
> > in
> > RFC 4122, which contains the following clause.
> > /*
> > ** Copyright (c) 1990- 1993, 1996 Open Software Foundation, Inc.
> > ** Copyright (c) 1989 by Hewlett-Packard Company, Palo Alto, Ca. &
> > ** Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard, Mass.
> > ** Copyright (c) 1998 Microsoft.
> > ** To anyone who acknowledges that this file is provided "AS IS"
> > ** without any express or implied warranty: permission to use, copy,
> > ** modify, and distribute this file for any purpose is hereby
> > ** granted without fee, provided that the above copyright notices and
> > ** this notice appears in all source code copies, and that none of
> > ** the names of Open Software Foundation, Inc., Hewlett-Packard
> > ** Company, Microsoft, or Digital Equipment Corporation be used in
> > ** advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software
> > ** without specific, written prior permission. Neither Open Software
> > ** Foundation, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Microsoft, nor Digital
> > ** Equipment Corporation makes any representations about the
> > ** suitability of this software for any purpose.
> > */
> > The same terms apply to this code.
> Which license is meant? The original BSD license or the modified one?
The difference is that it doesn't have a clause about advertising
materials mentioning features or use of the software must display an
Main Index |
Thread Index |