tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Options vs. Binary packages



Dennis den Brok <d.den.brok%uni-bonn.de@localhost> writes:

> Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> schrieb:
>> As for gnome, I really don't understand why the gnome folks recommend
>> anything non-free to start with.
>
> I've taken a look at the bulk build logs and GNOME is currently failing
> because of the lack of pkg-config files in native XFree86, so maybe
> this was a false alarm. Looking at the meta-pkg's dependencies, there
> doesn't seem to be a restricted one. The reason I came up with GNOME
> is ISTR there used to be such an issue earlier, but I can't verfiy that,
> lacking (access to) older bulk build logs.

OK.  Let me know if you find something.  This is the kind of thing that
I might have fixed and then forgotten about...


Attachment: pgpR0WfacIbG7.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index