Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)

To: Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov%tut.by@localhost>
Subject: Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
From: David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 01:05:18 +0000

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:50:06PM +0300, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
 > > upstream realized the problem and released 0.60, which I put in pkgsrc
 > > yesterday.
 > 
 > This is good, but the real problem is not with this particular package
 > but with that there is no control for downgrades at all.
 > Today I've filled a PR about this problem.

What do you mean by this? Your PR wasn't very clear. (Also see the
other message I just posted.)

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Manual updating CHANGES-YYYY considered harmful ;-)
  - From: Aleksey Cheusov
- Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
  - From: Aleksey Cheusov
- Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
  - From: Tonnerre Lombard
- Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
  - From: Aleksey Cheusov
- Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
  - From: David Holland
- Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
  - From: Alan Barrett
- Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
  - From: David Holland
- Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
  - From: Aleksey Cheusov

Prev by Date: Re: 2008Q1 -> current: downgrade
Next by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: updating CHANGES-YYYY manually considered harmful ;-)
Next by Thread: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index