[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: dependancies and bulk builds
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 05:42:09PM +0300, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
> >> The current approach guarantees correctness at the cost of longer
> >> build time. While saving build time is a worthwhile goal, we should
> >> not sacrifice correctness of the resulting (official) binary packages.
> > When a binary update for a security fix comes more than one week later
> > because pbulk decided to rebuild 90% of the 7526 packages, the update isn't
> > really usefull.
> Only packages affected by security fixes can be rebuild in this case.
> pbulk can do this.
> The only problem I see is the correct updating of
> pkg_summary(5). If nothing changed since pkg/37539 pbulk just cannot
> do this.
I think a cron rebuilds pkg_sumary on ftp anyway ...
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |