[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: patch filenames
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 01:30:12PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 12:50:44AM +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
> > 3. Group functional changes into one patch file:
> Absolutely rejected. This is a nightmare for maintainance.
I disagree, having designed and used a packaging system
which used this infrastructure. It works very well, is
kind to the SCM, and is efficient to the point of brevity.
You'll need to provide a better proof than vigorous assertion.
PS. I'd prefer to see the patch file names have the patched
file name embedded, for new patches, but that's another matter.
Main Index |
Thread Index |