Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule

To: tech-net%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
From: Christoph Badura <bad%bsd.de@localhost>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 09:47:48 +0200

On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 09:48:22PM +0200, Martin Neitzel wrote:
> That is correct, it is pretty rare.  Here's a survey I compiled these
> weekend.   Just one (1) system refused a spec with hostbits set.

Oh wow.  Thank you very much for doing that!

--chris

References:
- Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko
- Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Christoph Badura
- Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko
- Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Mouse
- Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko
- Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Martin Neitzel
- Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Christoph Badura
- Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Greg A. Woods
- Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
  - From: Martin Neitzel

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
Next by Date: IPv6 path MTU discovery not working (large number of retransmited TCP data packets)
Previous by Thread: Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
Next by Thread: Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index