Re: Proposal to apply mask to IP address set on rule

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Emmanuel Nyarko <emmankoko519%gmail.com@localhost> writes:

> I think a simple warning will do. That rightmost bits are not 0s.

Certainly better than silent failure, but I think one should be able to
use prefixes like 192.168.1.7/24.  As I said, that is a way of
documenting that it was .7 that got it added, but that the intent was
to block the neighborhood.