Re: RTM_MISS vs RTM_DELETE

To: "tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost" <tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: RTM_MISS vs RTM_DELETE
From: David Young <dyoung%pobox.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:20:32 -0500

On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 04:50:35AM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> dhcpcd wants to know if a router is unreachable.
> Not so it can drop the default route, but so it can start
> solicitations for a new router.

dhcpcd is not the only daemon that reads the routing socket.  Does
anybody test NetBSD with routing daemons like Quagga (or whatever it's
called now) and BIRD?

Dave

-- 
David Young
dyoung%pobox.com@localhost    Urbana, IL    (217) 721-9981

References:
- RTM_MISS vs RTM_DELETE
  - From: Roy Marples

Prev by Date: RTM_LOSING - what does it mean?
Next by Date: Re: panic: UBSan: Undefined Behavior in /syzkaller/managers/netbsd-kubsan/kernel/sys/netinet6/scope6.c:LINE, member access w
Previous by Thread: Re: RTM_MISS vs RTM_DELETE
Next by Thread: RTM_LOSING - what does it mean?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index