tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: removal of bpf_tap() (not bpf_mtap)



On 2018/06/23 0:10, Jason Thorpe wrote:


On Jun 22, 2018, at 2:50 AM, Masanobu SAITOH <msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost> wrote:

Hi.

The following two changes removed bpf_tap() which uses linear data
instead of mbuf:

	http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2018/06/22/msg096214.html
	http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2018/06/22/msg096215.html

Only above two drivers used bpf_tap(). There is no any driver
which use it now. Is it OK to remove from bpf.[ch]?

Seems fine to me.  It's trivial to wrap a linear buffer in an mbuf if needed.


 Removed.

 Thanks.


--
-----------------------------------------------
                SAITOH Masanobu (msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost
                                 msaitoh%netbsd.org@localhost)

-- thorpej



--
-----------------------------------------------
                SAITOH Masanobu (msaitoh%execsw.org@localhost
                                 msaitoh%netbsd.org@localhost)


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index