Re: ifdef inet

To: Maxime Villard <max%m00nbsd.net@localhost>, tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: ifdef inet
From: Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 12:43:13 +0100

On 19/04/2018 12:34, Maxime Villard wrote:

It would be good to decide whether we should keep the numerous #ifdef INETs
in our code. I've seen many files that inconsistently use #ifdef INET; one
place has them, another doesn't, and so on.


I think we should aim to keep it and even make it work.

Maybe one day INET6 will become prevalent enough to drop INET, or npfwill grow NAT64 so a pure INET6 network can talk to an INET one.

Roy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ifdef inet
  - From: Greg Troxel

References:
- ifdef inet
  - From: Maxime Villard

Prev by Date: ifdef inet
Next by Date: IPv6: dropping RH0?
Previous by Thread: ifdef inet
Next by Thread: Re: ifdef inet
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index