[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: IPsec: stack problems
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 03:39:49PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Also, crypto_dispatch already has a batching mechanism (CRYPTO_F_BATCH) - but
> it appears to be unused, so I'm not sure what we intended to do there either.
Remember there are two ways into this code -- isn't it used by the
/dev/crypto interface? Given I would have been the one who made those
changes, it's embarrassing to say I can't remember -- but it's been a
Thor Lancelot Simon tls%panix.com@localhost
"The two most common variations translate as follows:
illegitimi non carborundum = the unlawful are not silicon carbide
illegitimis non carborundum = the unlawful don't have silicon carbide."
Main Index |
Thread Index |