Re: Dealing with ICMPv6 network unreachable.

[Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>]

    Date:        Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:23:44 +0100
    From:        Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost>
    Message-ID:  <1428103424.3271.2.camel%uberlaptop2.marples.name@localhost>

  | Should our rtadvd be fixed not to advertise itself as a router if it's
  | not advertising any public prefixes?

It isn't the prefixes it has to advertise that matters, it is whether it
has the ability to actually send packets somewhere - if it has no routes,
it can't really be a router, and should not be advertising itself as one.

kre