Re: patch: sockaddr instead of mbuf to carry addresses

[Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>]

Tyler Retzlaff <rtr%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> hi,
> 
> attached is the first of a set of patches intended to remove the use of 
> mbuf as a bucket to carry sockaddr structures for per-user requests. 
> this patch introduces the structure required and changes bind.
> 
> i've been running it myself, the atf tests work with it and there has 
> been some private review prior to posting.
> 
> comments welcome
> 

Thanks for working on this.

Unfortunately, I have not had time for a careful review, but from a quick
check of the key parts it looks good.  One issue: why struct sockaddr_big?
I think we can and should use struct sockaddr_storage for this.  Also, is
there any reason why the address parameter could not be const?

-- 
Mindaugas