[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [PATCH] ip6_mroute.c return same value as IPv4
In article <20140212130627.GA26862%mx.elandsys.com@localhost>,
Loganaden Velvindron <logan%elandsys.com@localhost> wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:58:17AM -0800, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
>Please ignore as IPv4 doesn't implement that in IPv4, unlike FreeBSD.
1 EPERM Operation not permitted. An attempt was made to perform an
operation limited to processes with appropriate privileges or to
the owner of a file or other resources.
13 EACCES Permission denied. An attempt was made to access a file in a
way forbidden by its file access permissions.
EPERM is better IMHO.
>> From FreeBSD:
>> "IPv4 code returns EPERM if mrouter not initialized. Make IPv6 do the same."
>> Index: src/sys/netinet6/ip6_mroute.c
>> RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_mroute.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.104
>> diff -u -p -r1.104 ip6_mroute.c
>> --- src/sys/netinet6/ip6_mroute.c 14 Sep 2013 11:33:59 -0000 1.104
>> +++ src/sys/netinet6/ip6_mroute.c 12 Feb 2014 12:55:53 -0000
>> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ ip6_mrouter_set(struct socket *so, struc
>> mifi_t mifi;
>> if (sopt->sopt_name != MRT6_INIT && so != ip6_mrouter)
>> - return (EACCES);
>> + return (EPERM);
>> error = 0;
Main Index |
Thread Index |