[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 06:56:54AM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
> On 29/09/2013 8:24 PM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >So, if I get it right, you want one bridge(4) per forwarding
> >domain, not one bridge that handle several forwarding domain. How
> >would one port belonging to several forwarding domains (via 802.1q
> >encap for example) be represented ?
> Create multiple vlan(4) interfaces per port and have each vlan(4)
> interface be a member of a different bridge(4) domain.
I'm not sure I like this. This is the opposite of how you manage a
real switch (hp, cisco, etc ...). On these device, you have a single view
of the switching fabric, with vlan tag information when pertinent.
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |