Re: BPF_MISC+BPF_COP and BPF_COPX

[Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>]

Steven,

Steven Bellovin <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> wrote:
> There's a one-word summary: *assurance*.  With the current design,
> it's easy to *know* what can happen.  With a Turing-complete extension,
> it isn't.

It is still easy and the concept itself is very simple.  I mentioned that
this extension does not make byte-code Turing-complete and the rest is in
your control.  Darren ignored it.

-- 
Mindaugas