[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: BPF_MISC+BPF_COP and BPF_COPX
Steven Bellovin <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> wrote:
> There's a one-word summary: *assurance*. With the current design,
> it's easy to *know* what can happen. With a Turing-complete extension,
> it isn't.
It is still easy and the concept itself is very simple. I mentioned that
this extension does not make byte-code Turing-complete and the rest is in
your control. Darren ignored it.
Main Index |
Thread Index |