[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Experiments with npf on -current
Darren- I think that's entirely uncalled for and is not in the
interest of progress.Remember that this is -CURRENT, where things like
this are *supposed* to happen?
-SS-- NUNQUAM NON PARATUS
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Darren Reed <darrenr%netbsd.org@localhost>
> On 20/11/2011 9:48 PM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
>> David Brownlee <abs%absd.org@localhost> wrote:
>>> /etc/rc.d/npf reload
>>> Reloading NPF ruleset.
>>> npfctl: n-code size got wrong (36 != 72)
>>> /netbsd & /stand/amd64/5.99.56/modules/npf/npf.kmod from the same
>>> build last night.
>>> Could there be anything obvious I'm missing?
>> There are multiple regressions after IPv6 merge, which broke IPv4 filtering
>> as well. I have various fixes in my local tree, which I hope to finish in
>> upcoming week. Also, separate fixes for TCP state tracking, which are still
>> under testing.
> Well at least there is one firewall solution in NetBSD (ipfilter) where
> testing (prior to integration) and security are taken seriously.
Main Index |
Thread Index |