[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: getnameinfo extra len checking
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:06:36AM -0400, Sean Boudreau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 07:35:09PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > On Jun 17, 5:25pm, tls%panix.com@localhost (Thor Lancelot Simon) wrote:
> > -- Subject: Re: getnameinfo extra len checking
> > | On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 09:02:16PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > | >
> > | > What is sa_len in that case? I think it is 0. If so, then we can
> > allow
> > | > 0 through.
> > |
> > | What's setting 0? Not setting sa_len is bogus.
> > Right, linux code that does not set sa_len...
> So I'm leaning towards removing this check enirely. Would
> that be acceptable?
I do not think so. Why should we pander to broken code that doesn't
Main Index |
Thread Index |