tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: nameser.h vs nameser_compat.h



In article <20090515122522.GA12787%pintail.smokva.net@localhost>,
Petar Bogdanovic  <petar%smokva.net@localhost> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>while using res_query(3) I found out that a lot of examples in various
>3rd party programs use types/macros/defines from arpa/nameser_compat.h
>Stuff which was originally in arpa/nameser.h but then was moved and
>renamed in order to cleanup the naming (wild guess).
>
>I tried to stick with the newer arpa/nameser.h and found equivalents for
>all items I need, except the HEADER structure:
>
>            T_A --> ns_t_a
>       QFIXEDSZ --> NS_QFIXEDSZ
>       PACKETSZ --> NS_PACKETSZ
>          (...) --> (...)
>         HEADER --> ?
>
>
>Is there something like NS_HEADER or are you still supposed to use
>HEADER?
>

the ns_msg_* macros and function?

christos



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index