[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: network queue lengths
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:02:00PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >>>>> "Thor" == Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost> writes:
> >> This is getting a bit long, so I am going to hastily draw some
> >> conclusions. Please tell me if I am way off base:
> Thor> Let me say up front that I don't much care about ALTQ, and I
> Thor> care more about not harming performance on machines with very
> Thor> fast networks on both sides (or their only "side") than about
> Thor> reducing latency on machines with dramatically mismatched
> Thor> networks.
> I understand your point of view.
> I think this is a question about, if there was a tunable, what would
> the default be, and which group of people possess the smarts to tune it
> the "other" way.
> One important thing might be to treat packets forwarded differently
> from those locally generated. This inheritely distinguishes machines
> with only one "side"...
I think this is an interesting concept and might dovetail nicely with use
of multiple rings on the card for different purposes. OTOH, it might still
have a negative effect on routers which straddle two fat / fast networks,
so it would likely still need to be tunable. It also isn't likely to fix
it for the single-dumb-ring-NIC use case.
Time is an illusion; lunchtime, doubly so. |/\/\| Rafal Boni
-- Ford Prefect |\/\/|
Main Index |
Thread Index |