tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: FAST_IPSEC status (or: why is it in no kernel config file)

To: tech-net%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: FAST_IPSEC status (or: why is it in no kernel config file)
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:48:06 +0100

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:32:35AM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> Is FAST_IPSEC considered working? If so, should it be added to a few  
> kernel config files? It's currently not there as comment...

In that past the IPSec options where found to have a measurable impact
when included, even if no IPSec is in use. Has that changed?

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAST_IPSEC status (or: why is it in no kernel config file)
  - From: Hubert Feyrer

References:
- FAST_IPSEC status (or: why is it in no kernel config file)
  - From: Hubert Feyrer

Prev by Date: Tag mbufs with subnetwork source address? (PR 10495)
Next by Date: Re: FAST_IPSEC status (or: why is it in no kernel config file)
Previous by Thread: FAST_IPSEC status (or: why is it in no kernel config file)
Next by Thread: Re: FAST_IPSEC status (or: why is it in no kernel config file)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index