[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: v6 vs gif
> Non /64 prefix lengths is contrary to du jure standard for prefixes
> in 2000::/3. (rfc4291 section 2.5.4)
Oh, ouch. That's just insane. That certainly will be one RFC I'll be
ignoring (well, that I'll continue to ignore). Didn't the v6 people
learn _anything_ from the breakdown of v4 address classes?!
> De facto reality is a completely different matter. There is a
> notable amount of operational resistence to /64 on p2p links.
What would it even _mean_?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |