Re: Changing the default subnet route.

To: David Young <dyoung%pobox.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Changing the default subnet route.
From: Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:58:28 +0000

On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 12:58 -0600, David Young wrote:
> The fact that IPv6 (sort of) works, now, reinforces my hunch that
> your change to in.c was unnecessary, because your change to rtsock.c
> was sufficient.

The change to in.c is still necessary, the test script bails with the
same error without it but with the rtsock.c patch. With both patches it
works fine.

Thanks

Roy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- Changing the default subnet route.
  - From: Roy Marples
- Re: Changing the default subnet route.
  - From: Roy Marples
- Re: Changing the default subnet route.
  - From: David Young
- Re: Changing the default subnet route.
  - From: Roy Marples
- Re: Changing the default subnet route.
  - From: David Young

Prev by Date: Re: Changing the default subnet route.
Next by Date: Re: Improving the data supplied by BPF
Previous by Thread: Re: Changing the default subnet route.
Next by Thread: Re: Changing the default subnet route.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index