Re: pcc [was Re: valgrind]

[Anders Magnusson <ragge%tethuvudet.se@localhost>]

Den 2022-03-23 kl. 19:37, skrev Greg A. Woods:
> At Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:47:55 +0000, "Koning, Paul" <Paul.Koning%dell.com@localhost> wrote:
> Subject: Re: pcc [was Re: valgrind]
> > Out of curiosity: how does PCC code quality compare with that of
> > GCC and (for targets that it supports) Clang?
> Heh.  I would say PCC's generated code doesn't compare to either modern
> GCC or LLVM/Clang's output.
>
> I would say the main reason is PCC doesn't (as far as I know) employ
> any "Undefined Behaviour" caveat to optimize code, for example.
>
> I'll let the reader decide which might have the "higher" quality.
I would really want to know what you base these three statements on?

-- R