At Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:47:55 +0000, "Koning, Paul" <Paul.Koning%dell.com@localhost> wrote: Subject: Re: pcc [was Re: valgrind] > > > Out of curiosity: how does PCC code quality compare with that of > GCC and (for targets that it supports) Clang? Heh. I would say PCC's generated code doesn't compare to either modern GCC or LLVM/Clang's output. I would say the main reason is PCC doesn't (as far as I know) employ any "Undefined Behaviour" caveat to optimize code, for example. I'll let the reader decide which might have the "higher" quality. -- Greg A. Woods <gwoods%acm.org@localhost> Kelowna, BC +1 250 762-7675 RoboHack <woods%robohack.ca@localhost> Planix, Inc. <woods%planix.com@localhost> Avoncote Farms <woods%avoncote.ca@localhost>
Attachment:
pgpXFVR4bq8s4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature