Re: Proposal, again: Disable autoload of compat_xyz modules

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 07:39:45PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 07:21:17PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > As I have proposed. MUSL+LTP for catching functional regressions/bugs
> > AND fuzzing to catch crashes can be good enough to keep it trusted. The
> > kernel certainly needs a lot of bug fixes, but instead of disabling this
> > crucial feature it is better to find a way to make it more trusted.
> 
> Indeed. If we have a toolchain in pkgsrc (or some commparable easy setup)
> and a test suite, we can build more trust for some compat feature.

If the toolchain can be in pkgsrc, then I it should be much easier.
At some point I could build linux binaries running a linux gcc under
compat_linux.

Maybe it's just a matter of adding a suse_toolchain package ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--