Re: New getsockopt2() syscall

[Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>]

Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> wrote:
>On 08.06.2018 23:18, Robert Swindells wrote:
>> 
>> Are there any objections to the code for a getsockopt2() syscall
>> in:
>> 
>> <http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2018/03/06/msg023161.html>
>> 
>
>Can we reuse unused old syscall numbers?

Why ? We are not going to run out of them any time soon.

An "invalid syscall" error seems much easier to diagnose if an old
binary tries to call something that has been removed than getting
an argument error.