Re: New getsockopt2() syscall

To: christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Subject: Re: New getsockopt2() syscall
From: Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2018 14:20:41 +0100

christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
>In article <x71sdh565m.fsf%ren.fdy2.co.uk@localhost>,
>Robert Swindells  <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost> wrote:
>>
>>Are there any objections to the code for a getsockopt2() syscall
>>in:
>>
>><http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2018/03/06/msg023161.html>
>
>Let's write the man page to see if it makes sense :-)

What is the best way to provide it for review, diffs or the complete
page ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New getsockopt2() syscall
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- Re: New getsockopt2() syscall
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: New getsockopt2() syscall
Next by Date: Re: New getsockopt2() syscall
Previous by Thread: Re: New getsockopt2() syscall
Next by Thread: Re: New getsockopt2() syscall
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index