tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kmem_alloc(0, f)
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 03:23:50PM -0000, Michael van Elst wrote:
> martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann) writes:
>
> >On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 02:04:42PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> >> This seems like a foot-oriented panic gun, and it's been a source of
> >> problems in the past. Can we change it?
>
> >I think it is a valuable tool to catch driver bugs early during
> >developement, but wouldn't mind to reduce it to a KASSERT.
>
> So what does kmem_alloc(0, KM_SLEEP) do? fail where KM_SLEEP says it
> cannot fail? I don't think that it can return a zero sized allocation
> (i.e. ptr != NULL that cannot be dereferenced).
Just return a NULL pointer? That said, I do prefer just declaring it
invalid...
Joerg
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index