[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
mutex(9) on sparc64 RMO [was Re: pserialize(9) vs. TAILQ]
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:44:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: Eduardo Horvath <eeh%NetBSD.org@localhost>
I enhanced membar_ops with proper memory barriers and then was looking at
the mutex code. Unfortunately, I didn't get very far. It seemed at the
time that the mutex code has two hooks for memory barriers after the
atomic operations, however it's missing memory barrier hooks to ensure
consistency before accessing the lock.
What exactly is the consistency you need before accessing the lock?
Main Index |
Thread Index |