Re: callout_stop => callout_halt

[Ryota Ozaki <ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Taylor R Campbell
<campbell+netbsd-tech-kern%mumble.net@localhost> wrote:
>    Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 01:03:48 +0900
>    From: Ryota Ozaki <ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost>
>
>    In order to call callout_destroy for a callout
>    safely, we have to ensure no instance of the callout
>    is running. To do so, we should use callout_halt not
>    callout_stop, IIUC. However, there are several
>    callout_stop(); callout_destroy() sequences.
>    Should we replace such callout_stop with callout_halt?
>
> Yes.

Thanks. I'll prepare a patch for sweeping them out.

>
> We should also add a usb_rem_task_sync for the same purpose.

Someone please :)

  ozaki-r